Files
clientCommands/docs/versioning-and-releases.md
T
exteraGramPlugins 787965ebbf Initial commit
2026-10-09 12:25:06 +00:00

4.7 KiB

Versioning and releases

Git hooks and versioning

scripts/pre-commit bumps the patch number of version in plugin.json on every commit (1.0.0 → 1.0.1) and stages it into that same commit. scripts/post-commit re-stages plugin.json afterwards, because commits of a file selection (git commit -- <paths>, which some IDEs use) are built from a temporary index and would otherwise leave it looking modified.

The hooks enable themselves. Git never activates hooks from repository content, so a fresh clone, or a repo created from this template, starts without them. The first run of tools/bundle.py fixes that by running git config core.hooksPath scripts, and every workflow runs it: directly, or through scripts/deploy.sh and scripts/watch.sh. That includes --check, so after cloning run

python3 tools/bundle.py --check

once, before your first commit. A commit made before any build runs without the hooks. bundle.py leaves core.hooksPath alone when it is already set (so pointing it elsewhere on purpose sticks), skips the step in CI (whenever CI is set) and outside a git work tree, and never fails a build over it. To turn the hooks off for a clone, run git config core.hooksPath .git/hooks; git config --unset core.hooksPath only lasts until the next build.

The bump is skipped when:

  • the commit message contains [no bump], [skip bump], [no version bump] or [skip version] (case-insensitive; nobump, no-bump and no_bump also work),
  • NO_BUMP=1 (or GIT_NO_BUMP=1) is set, e.g. NO_BUMP=1 git commit, which is the only way for commits written in an editor, since their message doesn't exist yet when the hook runs,
  • version in plugin.json already differs from HEAD (you bumped it by hand, e.g. for a minor or major release),
  • a merge, rebase, cherry-pick or revert is in progress.

Because every version change publishes a release (see Publishing a release), a normal commit + push to main ships a new patch release. Use a stop word for commits that should not.

Publishing a release

.gitea/workflows/release.yml builds, verifies and publishes the .plugin to the repo's Releases tab on every push to main. dist/ is gitignored, so the artifact is always built by CI rather than committed. Nothing in the workflow is plugin-specific — it reads the id and version straight out of plugin.json, so it keeps working after you rename the plugin.

The version field in plugin.json is the single source of truth:

Push to main with… Result
a new version creates tag v<version> and a new release
the same version rebuilds the existing release, replacing its attachment

So every push leaves a downloadable build attached to the current version, and bumping version is what cuts a new release. With the git hooks enabled every commit bumps it, so every push of a normal commit cuts a new patch release. Pushing a v* tag by hand still works and uses that tag verbatim, as does a manual run (Actions → Publish plugin → Run workflow).

Every path runs --check, builds with --release, and gates the upload on verify_bundle.py, so a bundle that fails verification is never published. A rebuild replaces the attachment rather than piling up duplicates, and refreshes the release notes to name the commit it came from. The tag itself is never moved: it keeps pointing at the commit that first introduced that version.

Authentication uses secrets.API_TOKEN, an organisation-level Actions secret holding a user token with the write:repository scope (which covers releases). Set it once under Org → Settings → Actions → Secrets and every repo in the organisation inherits it; a repo-level secret of the same name takes precedence if one repo ever needs different credentials.

The workflow passes it to release.py as RELEASE_TOKEN, not GITEA_TOKEN. The Actions runner injects its own GITEA_TOKEN into every step, and that value overrides a step-level env: entry of the same name, so the org secret would be silently ignored.

If the org secret does not reach a repository the publish still works: release.py tries RELEASE_TOKEN first and then falls back to the runner's GITEA_TOKEN, which can publish releases in its own repository, and prints which one it used. An organisation secret is only exposed to a repository that has Actions enabled, so check Repo → Settings → Actions if a repo unexpectedly falls back.

If you would rather not manage a token at all, that injected GITEA_TOKEN can create releases in its own repo: pass --token-env GITEA_TOKEN and drop the org secret. It is scoped to the single job and expires with it, so it is the safer default; API_TOKEN is what you want when publishing needs to reach beyond this repo.